Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Generic Top Level Domain Name (gTLD) Decisions |
Washington State Lottery v. Kendell Lang
d/b/a Virtual CIO
Claim Number: FA0208000123893
PARTIES
Complainant
is Washington State Lottery,
Olympia, WA (“Complainant”) represented by Meredith
Wright Morton, of Office of the
Attorney General. Respondent is Kendell Lang d/b/a Virtual CIO Del
Mar, CA (“Respondent”).
REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAMES
The
domain names at issue are <walottery.com>
and <washingtonlottery.com>, registered with Bulkregister.
PANEL
The
undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and, to
the best of his knowledge, has no known conflict
in serving as Panelist in this
proceeding.
The
Honorable Charles K. McCotter, Jr. (Ret.) as Panelist.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant
submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum (the “Forum”)
electronically on August 27, 2002; the Forum received
a hard copy of the
Complaint on August 30, 2002.
On
August 29, 2002, Bulkregister confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the domain
names <walottery.com> and <washingtonlottery.com> are registered with Bulkregister and
that Respondent is the current registrant of the names. Bulkregister has verified that Respondent is
bound by the Bulkregister registration agreement and has thereby agreed to
resolve domain-name
disputes brought by third parties in accordance with
ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”).
On
September 5, 2002, a Notification of Complaint and Commencement of
Administrative Proceeding (the “Commencement Notification”),
setting a deadline
of September 25, 2002 by which Respondent could file a Response to the
Complaint, was transmitted to Respondent
via e-mail, post and fax, to all
entities and persons listed on Respondent’s registration as technical,
administrative and billing
contacts, and to postmaster@walottery.com, and
postmaster@washingtonlottery.com by e-mail.
Having
received no Response from Respondent, using the same contact details and
methods as were used for the Commencement Notification,
the Forum transmitted
to the parties a Notification of Respondent Default.
On
October 15, 2002, pursuant to Complainant’s request to have the dispute decided
by a single-member Panel, the Forum appointed the
Honorable Charles K.
McCotter, Jr. (Ret.) as Panelist.
Having
reviewed the communications records, the Administrative Panel (the “Panel”)
finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility
under Paragraph 2(a) of
the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”) “to
employ reasonably available
means calculated to achieve actual notice to
Respondent.” Therefore, the Panel may
issue its decision based on the documents submitted and in accordance with the
ICANN Policy, ICANN Rules,
the Forum’s Supplemental Rules and any rules and
principles of law that the Panel deems applicable, without the benefit of any
Response
from Respondent.
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant
requests that the domain names be transferred from Respondent to Complainant.
PARTIES’ CONTENTIONS
A.
Complainant
The
<walottery.com>
and <washingtonlottery.com> domain names are confusingly similar
to Complainant's WASHINGTON STATE LOTTERY mark.
Respondent
has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names.
Respondent
registered and used the disputed domain names in bad faith.
B.
Respondent
Respondent
failed to submit a Response.
FINDINGS
Complainant, Washington State Lottery,
has sold lottery tickets throughout the state of Washington for twenty
years. Complainant promotes, markets,
advertises, and sells instant scratch and online tickets. Complainant uses its WASHINGTON STATE
LOTTERY mark in connection with lottery tickets, stationery, posters,
advertising and website
in promoting the sales of lottery tickets.
Complainant is the record owner of a
Washington State Trademark Registration for WASHINGTON STATE LOTTERY. Complainant has used the mark in commerce
continuously since October 27, 1982.
Complainant has spent millions of dollars since 1982, promoting the
WASHINGTON STATE LOTTERY mark throughout the state of Washington. Complainant’s mission is mandated by the
Washington State Legislature, therefore it is required to “produce the maximum
amount of
net revenue for the state consonant with the dignity of the state and
the general welfare of the people.”
Complainant’s mark is extremely valuable to the success of this
mission. Complainant’s mark identifies
the source of Washington State’s only legal lottery.
Respondent registered the disputed domain
names on April 26, 1998. Respondent has
not created a website at the domain names, even though they have been
registered since 1998. Complainant’s
investigation has revealed that Respondent engages in the practice of
warehousing domain names in order to sell them.
DISCUSSION
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules instructs this Panel to
“decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in
accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law
that it deems applicable.”
In view
of Respondent's failure to submit a Response, the Panel shall decide this
administrative proceeding on the basis of the Complainant's
undisputed
representations pursuant to paragraphs 5(e), 14(a) and 15(a) of the Rules and
draw such inferences it considers appropriate
pursuant to paragraph 14(b) of
the Rules.
Paragraph
4(a) of the Policy requires that the Complainant must prove each of the
following three elements to obtain an order that
a domain name should be
cancelled or transferred:
(1) the domain name registered by Respondent
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
Complainant has
rights; and
(2)
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name;
and
(3)
the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
Identical and/or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has established that it has
rights in the WASHINGTON STATE LOTTERY mark through registration with the state
of Washington,
and continuous use for the last twenty years.
Respondent’s <walottery.com> and <washingtonlottery.com> domain names are confusingly similar to
Complainant’s WASHINGTON STATE LOTTERY mark because they are both abbreviations
of Complainant’s
mark. The <walottery.com> domain
name merely abbreviates “Washington” and omits the word “state,” whereas <washingtonlottery.com> merely omits the word “state.” The primary element of both domain names is
the fact that they signify WASHINGTON STATE LOTTERY, which is distinctive
because it is
the only lottery in Washington.
The abbreviation of a word does not create a distinct mark capable of
overcoming a claim of confusing similarity.
See Minn. State
Lottery v. Mendes, FA 96701 (Nat. Arb. Forum Apr. 2, 2001) (finding that
the <mnlottery.com> domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s
MINNESOTA STATE LOTTERY registered mark); see also Coca-Cola Co. v. Busch,
44 F.Supp. 405, 410 (E.D.Pa. 1942) (“the abbreviation of the trade-mark which
the public has used and adopted as designating the product of the
[trademark
owner] is equally as much to be protected as the trademark itself”). Furthermore, the omission of the word
“state” in both domain names does not create a distinct mark because the words
“Washington lottery”
are the dominant elements of Complainant’s mark. See Down East Enter. Inc. v. Countywide Communications, FA 96613 (Nat.
Arb. Forum Apr. 5, 2001) (finding the domain name <downeastmagazine.com>
confusingly similar to Complainant’s
common law mark DOWN EAST, THE MAGAZINE OF
MAINE); see also WestJet Air
Center, Inc. v. West Jets LLC, FA 96882 (Nat. Arb. Forum Apr. 20, 2001)
(finding that the <westjets.com> domain name is confusingly similar to
Complainant’s
mark, where Complainant holds the WEST JET AIR CENTER mark).
The Panel finds that Policy ¶ 4(a)(i) has
been satisfied.
Rights or Legitimate Interests
Respondent has failed to respond,
therefore it is assumed that Respondent lacks rights and legitimate interests
in the disputed domain
names. When
Complainant asserts a prima facie case against Respondent, the burden of
proof shifts to Respondent to show that it has rights or legitimate interests
pursuant to Policy
¶ 4(a)(ii). See
Do The Hustle, LLC v. Tropic Web, D2000-0624 (WIPO Aug. 21, 2000) (finding
that once Complainant asserts that Respondent has no rights or legitimate
interests in
respect of the domain, the burden shifts to Respondent to provide
credible evidence that substantiates its claim of rights and legitimate
interests in the domain name); see also Parfums Christian Dior v. QTR Corp., D2000-0023 (WIPO Mar. 9, 2000)
(finding that by not submitting a Response, Respondent has failed to invoke any
circumstance which
could demonstrate any rights or legitimate interests in the
domain name).
Furthermore, because Respondent has not
submitted a Response, it is appropriate for the Panel to accept all reasonable
allegations
and inferences in the Complaint as true. See Vertical
Solutions Mgmt., Inc. v. webnet-marketing, inc., FA 95095 (Nat. Arb. Forum
July 31, 2000) (failure to respond allows all reasonable inferences of fact in
the allegations of Complainant
to be deemed true); see also Charles Jourdan Holding AG v. AAIM,
D2000-0403 (WIPO June 27, 2000) (finding it appropriate for the Panel to draw
adverse inferences from Respondent’s failure to reply
to the Complaint).
Respondent has held the two disputed
domain names since 1998 and has failed to make any use of them. There is currently no website at either
domain name. The passive holding of a
domain name for such a length of time gives rise to the presumption that
Respondent lacks rights and legitimate
interests in the domain names because
they are not being used in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or
services pursuant
to Policy ¶ 4(c)(i) or a legitimate, noncommercial or fair
use pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(c)(iii). See Bloomberg L.P. v. Sandhu, FA 96261
(Nat. Arb. Forum Feb. 12, 2001) (finding that no rights or legitimate interest
can be found when Respondent fails to use
disputed domain names in any way); see
also Ziegenfelder Co. v. VMH Enter.,
Inc., D2000-0039 (WIPO Mar. 14, 2000) (finding that failure to provide a
product or service or develop the site demonstrates that Respondents
have not
established any rights or legitimate interests in the domain name).
Complainant is the only state sanctioned
lottery, and therefore it may be presumed that Respondent is not commonly known
as WASHINGTON
STATE LOTTERY or any derivative of Complainant’s mark. Furthermore, Respondent has not come forward
with any evidence that it is commonly known as WASHINGTON LOTTERY, WA LOTTERY,
<washingtonlottery.com>, or <walottery.com>,
therefore it has failed to establish that it has rights or legitimate interests
in the disputed domain names pursuant to Policy
¶ 4(c)(ii). See Gallup Inc. v. Amish Country Store, FA 96209 (Nat. Arb. Forum Jan.
23, 2001) (finding that Respondent does not have rights in a domain name when
Respondent is not known
by the mark); see also Compagnie de Saint Gobain v. Com-Union Corp., D2000-0020 (WIPO
Mar. 14, 2000) (finding no rights or legitimate interest where Respondent was
not commonly known by the mark and
never applied for a license or permission
from Complainant to use the trademarked name).
The Panel finds that Policy ¶ 4(a)(ii)
has been satisfied.
Registration and Use in Bad Faith
Respondent has been passively holding the
disputed domain names since 1998.
Respondent has not developed a website, or used the domain names in any
other manner. After Respondent has
passively held a domain name for two years a presumption of bad faith
registration and use arises. Therefore,
Respondent’s behavior is evidence of bad faith registration and use pursuant to
Policy ¶ 4(a)(iii). See DCI S.A. v. Link Commercial Corp.,
D2000-1232 (WIPO Dec. 7, 2000) (concluding that Respondent’s passive holding of
the domain name satisfies the requirement of ¶
4(a)(iii) of the Policy); see
also Mondich & Am. Vintage Wine
Biscuits, Inc. v. Brown, D2000-0004 (WIPO Feb. 16, 2000) (holding that
Respondent’s failure to develop its website in a two year period raises the
inference
of registration in bad faith).
Furthermore, based on the fact that
Respondent has engaged in the warehousing of domain names for sale, it can be
inferred that Respondent
registered <washingtonlottery.com> and
<walottery.com> with the intention of selling, renting or
transferring its rights to the domain names.
Registration of a domain name with the primary intention of selling the
registration is considered to be evidence of bad faith registration
and use
pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(b)(i). See Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Meeting Point
Co., D2000-1245 (WIPO Dec. 7, 2000) (finding bad faith where Respondent
made no use of the domain names except to offer them to sale
to Complainant); see
also Cruzeiro Licenciamentos Ltda v.
Sallen, D2000-0715 (WIPO Sept. 6, 2000) (finding that mere passive holding
of a domain name can qualify as bad faith if the domain name
owner’s conduct
creates the impression that the name is for sale).
The Panel finds that Policy ¶
4(a)(iii) has been satisfied.
DECISION
Having established all three elements
required under the ICANN Policy, the Panel concludes that the requested relief
shall be hereby
GRANTED.
Accordingly, it is Ordered that the
domain names <walottery.com> and <washingtonlottery.com> be TRANSFERRED from Respondent
to Complainant.
The Honorable Charles K. McCotter, Jr.
(Ret.), Panelist
Dated: October 21, 2002
WorldLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/GENDND/2002/1463.html