Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Generic Top Level Domain Name (gTLD) Decisions |
TM Acquisition Corp. v. Peter Carrington
Claim Number: FA0209000124850
PARTIES
Complainant
is TM Acquisition Corp., Las Vegas,
NV (“Complainant”) represented by Kathryn
S. Geib. Respondent is Peter Carrington, Fort Lauderdale, FL
(“Respondent”).
REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME
The
domain name at issue is <centurey21.com>,
registered with Internet Domain Registry
Ltd.
PANEL
The
undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to
the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in
serving as Panelist in this
proceeding.
James
A. Crary as Panelist.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Complainant
submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum (the “Forum”)
electronically on September 9, 2002; the Forum received
a hard copy of the
Complaint on September 10, 2002.
On
September 13, 2002, Internet Domain Registry Ltd. confirmed by e-mail to the
Forum that the domain name <centurey21.com>
is registered with Internet Domain Registry Ltd. and that Respondent is the
current registrant of the name. Internet
Domain Registry Ltd. has verified that Respondent is bound by the Internet
Domain Registry Ltd. registration agreement and
has thereby agreed to resolve
domain-name disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN’s Uniform
Domain Name Dispute
Resolution Policy (the “Policy”).
On
September 13, 2002, a Notification of Complaint and Commencement of
Administrative Proceeding (the “Commencement Notification”),
setting a deadline
of October 3, 2002 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint,
was transmitted to Respondent via
e-mail, post and fax, to all entities and
persons listed on Respondent’s registration as technical, administrative and
billing contacts,
and to postmaster@centurey21.com by e-mail.
Having
received no Response from Respondent, using the same contact details and
methods as were used for the Commencement Notification,
the Forum transmitted
to the parties a Notification of Respondent Default.
On
October 23, 2002, pursuant to Complainant’s request to have the dispute decided
by a single-member Panel, the Forum appointed James
A. Crary as Panelist.
Having
reviewed the communications records, the Administrative Panel (the “Panel”)
finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility
under Paragraph 2(a) of
the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”) “to
employ reasonably available
means calculated to achieve actual notice to
Respondent.” Therefore, the Panel may
issue its decision based on the documents submitted and in accordance with the
ICANN Policy, ICANN Rules,
the Forum’s Supplemental Rules and any rules and
principles of law that the Panel deems applicable, without the benefit of any
Response
from Respondent.
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant
requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant.
PARTIES’ CONTENTIONS
A.
Complainant
The
<centurey21.com>
domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's CENTURY 21 mark.
Respondent
has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name.
Respondent
registered and used the disputed domain name in bad faith.
B.
Respondent
Respondent
failed to submit a Response.
FINDINGS
Complainant uses the CENTURY 21 mark in
relation to real estate brokerage services.
Complainant holds five trademark registrations with the United States
Patent and Trademark Office including Registration Numbers 1,063,488;
1,085,039; 1,304,095; 1,429,531; and 2,178,970. Complainant is also the owner of trademarks in 101 different
countries. Complainant has used the
CENTURY 21 mark continuously since 1972.
Complainant is a franchiser of a system
of business of the promotion and assistance of independently owned and operated
real estate
brokerage offices, including policies, procedures and techniques
designed to enable such offices to compete more effectively in the
real estate
sales market. Complainant has licensed
its marks to Master Franchisors operating in 26 other countries. Complainant has expended many millions of
dollars and has put much effort into advertising, promoting and establishing
the goodwill
of the CENTURY 21 marks in association with its business. As a result, Complainant’s CENTURY 21 mark
has become distinctive and famous.
Complainant also operates its principal
website and holds the registration for the <century21.com> domain name.
Respondent registered the disputed domain
name on March 28, 2002. Respondent has
used the disputed domain name in order to divert Internet traffic to
<amaturevideos.nl>. At the time
of the Complaint, Respondent was using <centurey21.com> in order
to divert Internet users to <hanky-panky-college.com>.
DISCUSSION
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules instructs this Panel to
“decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in
accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law
that it deems applicable.”
In view
of Respondent's failure to submit a Response, the Panel shall decide this
administrative proceeding on the basis of the Complainant's
undisputed
representations pursuant to paragraphs 5(e), 14(a) and 15(a) of the Rules and
draw such inferences it considers appropriate
pursuant to paragraph 14(b) of
the Rules.
Paragraph
4(a) of the Policy requires that the Complainant must prove each of the
following three elements to obtain an order that
a domain name should be
cancelled or transferred:
(1) the domain name registered by Respondent
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
Complainant has
rights; and
(2)
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name;
and
(3)
the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
Identical and/or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has established that it has
rights in the CENTURY 21 mark through continuous use and registration with the
United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
Respondent’s <centurey21.com>
domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark because it merely
misspells the word “century” by adding an “e” between
the last two
letters. Respondent is therefore taking
advantage a common spelling error by Internet users when they are attempting to
reach Complainant’s
website by typing CENTURY 21 into the browser. Complainant’s mark is the dominant element
of the domain name and therefore Respondent’s <centurey21.com>
domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark. See Reuters Ltd. v. Global Net 2000, Inc., D2000-0441 (WIPO July 13,
2000) (finding that a domain name which differs by only one letter from a
trademark has a greater tendency
to be confusingly similar to the trademark
where the trademark is highly distinctive); see also State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Try Harder & Co., FA 94730
(Nat. Arb. Forum June 15, 2000) (finding that the domain name
<statfarm.com> is confusingly similar to Complainant’s
STATE FARM mark).
The Panel finds that Policy ¶ 4(a)(i) has
been satisfied.
Rights or Legitimate Interests
Respondent has failed to respond,
therefore it is assumed that Respondent lacks rights and legitimate interests
in the disputed domain
name. When
Complainant asserts a prima facie case against Respondent, the burden of
proof shifts to Respondent to show that it has rights or legitimate interests
pursuant to
Policy ¶ 4(a)(ii). See
Do The Hustle, LLC v. Tropic Web, D2000-0624 (WIPO Aug. 21, 2000) (finding
that once Complainant asserts that Respondent has no rights or legitimate
interests in
respect of the domain, the burden shifts to Respondent to provide
credible evidence that substantiates its claim of rights and legitimate
interests in the domain name); see also Parfums Christian Dior v. QTR Corp., D2000-0023 (WIPO Mar. 9, 2000)
(finding that by not submitting a Response,
Respondent has failed to invoke any circumstance which could demonstrate
any rights or legitimate interests in the domain name).
Furthermore, because Respondent has not
submitted a Response, it is appropriate for the Panel to accept all reasonable
allegations
and inferences in the Complaint as true. See Vertical
Solutions Mgmt., Inc. v. webnet-marketing, inc., FA 95095 (Nat. Arb. Forum
July 31, 2000) (failure to respond allows all reasonable inferences of fact in
the allegations of Complainant
to be deemed true); see also Charles Jourdan Holding AG v. AAIM,
D2000-0403 (WIPO June 27, 2000) (finding it appropriate for the Panel to draw
adverse inferences from Respondent’s failure to reply
to the Complaint).
Respondent is using a domain name that is
confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark in order to divert Internet users to
a pornographic
website. Internet users
that accidentally misspell Complainant’s mark are unwillingly transported to
<hanky-panky-college.com>. This
type of diversionary use of the disputed domain name is not considered to be in
connection with a bona fide offering of
goods or services pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(c)(i), or a legitimate noncommercial
or fair use pursuant to Policy
¶ 4(c)(iii).
See Brown & Bigelow,
Inc. v. Rodela, FA 96466 (Nat. Arb. Forum Mar. 5, 2001) (finding that
infringing on another's well-known mark to provide a link to a pornographic
site is not a legitimate or fair use); see also Nat’l Football League Prop., Inc. v. One Sex Entm’t Co., D2000-0118
(WIPO Apr. 17, 2000) (finding that Respondent had no rights or legitimate
interests in the domain names <chargergirls.com>
and
<chargergirls.net> where Respondent linked these domain names to its
pornographic website).
Furthermore, there is no evidence on
record that proves that Respondent is commonly known by any other name than
Peter Carrington. Respondent has not
come forward with any submissions that establish that it is commonly known as
CENTUREY 21 or <centurey21.com>, therefore Respondent has failed
to establish that it has rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain
name pursuant
to Policy ¶ 4(c)(ii). See Gallup Inc. v. Amish Country Store, FA
96209 (Nat. Arb. Forum Jan. 23, 2001) (finding that Respondent does not have
rights in a domain name when Respondent is not known
by the mark); see also
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Webdeal.com,
Inc., FA 95162 (Nat. Arb. Forum Aug. 29, 2000) (finding that Respondent has
no rights or legitimate interests in domain names because
it is not commonly
known by Complainant’s marks and Respondent has not used the domain names in
connection with a bona fide offering
of goods and services or for a legitimate
noncommercial or fair use).
The Panel finds that Policy ¶ 4(a)(ii)
has been satisfied.
Registration and Use in Bad Faith
Based on the well-known nature of
Complainant’s CENTURY 21 mark, and the fact that Respondent registered a
misspelling of this mark,
it can be inferred that Respondent had knowledge of
Complainant’s rights in the CENTURY 21 mark when it registered the disputed
domain
name. Registration of a domain
name that is confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark, despite knowledge of
Complainant’s rights is evidence
of bad faith registration pursuant to Policy ¶
4(a)(iii). See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Fisher, D2000-1412
(WIPO Dec. 18. 2000) (finding that Respondent had actual and constructive
knowledge of Complainant’s EXXON mark given
the worldwide prominence of the
mark and thus Respondent registered the domain name in bad faith); see also
Victoria's Secret v. Hardin, FA 96694
(Nat Arb. Forum Mar. 31, 2001) (finding that, in light of the notoriety of
Complainants' famous marks, Respondent had actual
or constructive knowledge of
the BODY BY VICTORIA marks at the time she registered the disputed domain name
and such knowledge constituted
bad faith).
Respondent is using the <centurey21.com>
domain name in order to divert Internet users to a pornographic website. It can be inferred, based on Respondent’s
tactic of utilizing a misspelling of a well-known mark that Respondent receives
a monetary
benefit from each Internet user diverted to the pornographic
website. Respondent’s use of a
confusingly similar domain name in order to commercially benefit is evidence of
bad faith use pursuant to Policy
¶ 4(b)(iv).
See State Fair of Texas v.
Granbury.com, FA 95288 (Nat. Arb. Forum Sept. 12, 2000) (finding bad faith
where Respondent registered the domain name <bigtex.net> to infringe
on
Complainant’s goodwill and attract Internet users to Respondent’s website); see
also Am. Online, Inc. v. Tencent
Comm. Corp., FA 93668 (Nat. Arb. Forum Mar. 21, 2000) (finding bad faith
where Respondent registered and used an infringing domain name to attract
users
to a website sponsored by Respondent).
The Panel finds that Policy ¶ 4(a)(iii)
has been satisfied.
DECISION
Having established all three elements
required under the ICANN Policy, the Panel concludes that the requested relief
shall be hereby
granted.
Accordingly, it is Ordered that the
domain name <centurey21.com>
be transferred from Respondent to Complainant.
James A. Crary, Panelist
Dated: November 4, 2002
WorldLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/GENDND/2002/1508.html