Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Generic Top Level Domain Name (gTLD) Decisions |
America Online, Inc. v. Steven Brom
Claim Number: FA0203000105855
PARTIES
Complainant
is America Online, Inc., Dulles, VA (“Complainant”) represented by James
R. Davis, of Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn. Respondent is Steven Brom, Brooklyn,
NY (“Respondent”).
REGISTRAR AND
DISPUTED DOMAIN NAMES
The
domain names at issue are <aollovers.com> and <sexyonaol.com>,
registered with Enom, Inc.
PANEL
The
undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to
the best of his knowledge, has no known conflict
in serving as Panelist in this
proceeding.
James
A. Crary as Panelist.
PROCEDURAL
HISTORY
Complainant
submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum (the “Forum”)
electronically on March 12, 2002; the Forum received
a hard copy of the
Complaint on March 15, 2002.
On
March 18, 2002, Enom, Inc. confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the domain
names <aollovers.com> and <sexyonaol.com> are
registered with Enom, Inc. and that Respondent is the current registrant of the
names. Enom, Inc. has verified that
Respondent is bound by the Enom, Inc. registration agreement and has thereby
agreed to resolve domain-name
disputes brought by third parties in accordance
with ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy”).
On
March 19, 2002, a Notification of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative
Proceeding (the “Commencement Notification”), setting
a deadline of April 8,
2002 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, was transmitted
to Respondent via e-mail,
post and fax, to all entities and persons listed on
Respondent’s registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts,
and to postmaster@aollovers.com and postmaster@sexyonaol.com by e-mail.
Having
received no Response from Respondent, using the same contact details and
methods as were used for the Commencement Notification,
the Forum transmitted
to the parties a Notification of Respondent Default.
On
April 8, 2002 pursuant to Complainant’s request to have the dispute decided by
a single-member Panel, the Forum appointed James
A. Crary as Panelist.
Having
reviewed the communications records, the Administrative Panel (the “Panel”)
finds that the Forum has discharged its responsibility
under Paragraph 2(a) of
the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”) “to
employ reasonably available
means calculated to achieve actual notice to
Respondent.” Therefore, the Panel may
issue its decision based on the documents submitted and in accordance with the
ICANN Policy, ICANN Rules,
the Forum’s Supplemental Rules and any rules and
principles of law that the Panel deems applicable, without the benefit of any
Response
from Respondent.
RELIEF SOUGHT
Complainant
requests that the domain names be transferred from Respondent to Complainant.
PARTIES’
CONTENTIONS
A.
Complainant
The
disputed domain names <aollovers.com> and <sexyonaol.com>
are confusingly similar to AOL and AOL.COM, registered marks in which
Complainant holds rights.
Respondent
has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names.
Respondent
registered and used the disputed domain names in bad faith.
B.
Respondent
Respondent
did not submit a Response in this proceeding.
FINDINGS
Complainant is the owner of numerous
trademark registrations worldwide for the mark AOL, including U.S. trademark
registration numbers
1,977,731 and 1,984,337, registered on the Principal
Register on June 4, 1996 and July 2, 1996 respectively. Complainant also holds registration of the
trademark AOL.COM. Complainant has used
these marks (the “AOL marks”) in connection with computer services, computer
bulletin boards, computer networks,
computerized research and reference
materials, and other telecommunications services.
Complainant has invested millions of
dollars to promote the AOL marks and boasts that over 30 million users
subscribe to its services. Due to the
substantial promotion of its marks and large global customer base, the AOL
marks have become famous worldwide.
Respondent registered the disputed domain
names on December 31, 2001, and has used the domain names to display
pornographic pictures
and to redirect Internet users to commercial pornographic
websites.
DISCUSSION
Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules instructs this Panel to
“decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in
accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law
that it deems applicable.”
In view
of Respondent's failure to submit a Response, the Panel shall decide this
administrative proceeding on the basis of the Complainant's
undisputed
representations pursuant to paragraphs 5(e), 14(a) and 15(a) of the Rules and
draw such inferences it considers appropriate
pursuant to paragraph 14(b) of
the Rules.
Paragraph
4(a) of the Policy requires that the Complainant must prove each of the
following three elements to obtain an order that
a domain name should be
cancelled or transferred:
(1)
the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly
similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant
has rights; and
(2)
the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain
name; and
(3)
the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
Identical and/or Confusingly Similar
Complainant has demonstrated its rights
in the AOL marks through registration with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office and
continuous subsequent use. The disputed domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant’s
marks as they merely add generic terms to the distinct marks. See Arthur Guinness Son & Co.
(Dublin) Ltd. v. Healy/BOSTH,
D2001-0026 (WIPO Mar. 23, 2001) (finding confusing similarity where the domain
name in dispute contains the identical mark of the
Complainant combined with a
generic word or term); see also Am. Online, Inc. v. iDomainNames.com, FA
93766 (Nat. Arb. Forum Mar. 24, 2000) (finding that Respondent’s domain name
<go2AOL.com> was confusingly similar to Complainant’s
AOL mark). The dominant feature of the disputed domain
names is AOL, which reflects Complainant’s marks. See Am. Online, Inc. v. Tella, FA 101820 (Nat. Arb. Forum Dec. 28, 2001) (finding that
“the acronym ‘AOL’ has acquired, for the public, a distinctive meaning,
which
points . . .
to Complainant's business and services”).
Accordingly, the Panel finds
that Policy ¶ 4(a)(i) has been satisfied.
Rights or Legitimate Interests
Complainant has established its rights
and interests in the AOL marks. Because
the Respondent has not submitted a Response in this matter, the Panel may
presume that it has no such rights or legitimate
interests. See Pavillion Agency, Inc. v. Greenhouse
Agency Ltd., D2000-1221 (WIPO Dec. 4, 2000) (finding that Respondents’
failure to respond can be construed as an admission that they have no
legitimate interest in the domain names).
Respondent’s use of the infringing domain
names to host and advertise pornographic material cannot be deemed a bona fide
offering
of goods or services pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(c)(i) or a legitimate
noncommercial or fair use pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(c)(iii). See MatchNet plc v. MAC Trading,
D2000-0205 (WIPO May 11, 2000) (finding that it is not a bona fide offering of
goods or services to use a domain name for commercial
gain by attracting
Internet users to third party sites offering sexually explicit and pornographic
material, where such use is calculated
to mislead consumers and tarnish the
Complainant’s mark); see also Brown & Bigelow, Inc. v. Rodela, FA
96466 (Nat. Arb. Forum Mar. 5, 2001) (finding that infringing on another's
well-known mark to provide a link to a pornographic
site is not a legitimate or
fair use).
Further, there is no evidence Respondent
is commonly known by the disputed domain names pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(c)(ii);
Respondent
is only known to this Panel as Steven Brom. See Gallup Inc. v. Amish Country Store,
FA 96209 (Nat. Arb. Forum Jan. 23, 2001) (finding that Respondent does not have
rights in a domain name when Respondent is not known
by the mark); see also
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. D3M Virtual Reality Inc. & D3M Domain
Sales, AF-0336 (eResolution Sept. 23, 2000) (finding no rights or
legitimate interests where no such right or interest was immediately
apparent
to the Panel and Respondent did not come forward to suggest any right or
interest it may have possessed).
The Panel finds that Respondent has no
rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names and,
thus, Policy ¶
4(a)(ii) has been satisfied.
Registration and Use in Bad Faith
Respondent has registered and used the
disputed domain names for profit by taking advantage of the fame and notoriety
of Complainant’s
marks. In so doing,
Respondent has caused Internet user confusion as to the affiliation or
sponsorship of its websites and tarnished Complainant’s
reputation and
goodwill. Such behavior demonstrates
bad faith registration and use pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(b)(iv). See State Fair of Texas v. Granbury.com,
FA 95288 (Nat. Arb. Forum Sept. 12, 2000) (finding bad faith where Respondent
registered the domain name <bigtex.net> to infringe
on Complainant’s
goodwill and attract Internet users to Respondent’s website); see also
Geocities v. Geociites.com, D2000-0326 (WIPO June 19, 2000) (finding bad
faith where the Respondent linked the domain name in question to websites
displaying
banner advertisements and pornographic material).
Additionally, Respondent’s registration
and use of two infringing domain names demonstrates a pattern of behavior
calculated to disrupt
Complainant’s business and potentially prevent it from
registering domain names that reflect its marks. See YAHOO! Inc. v. Syrynx,
Inc. & Hamilton, D2000-1675
(WIPO Jan. 30, 2001) (finding a bad faith pattern pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(b)(ii)
in Respondent's registration of two domain
names incorporating Complainant's
YAHOO! mark).
Accordingly, the
Panel finds that Policy ¶ 4(a)(iii) has been satisfied.
DECISION
Having established all three elements
required under the ICANN Policy, the Panel concludes that the requested relief
should be hereby
granted.
Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <aollovers.com>
and <sexyonaol.com> domain names be transferred from
Respondent to Complainant.
James A. Crary, Panelist
Dated: April 18, 2002
WorldLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/GENDND/2002/574.html