Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Generic Top Level Domain Name (gTLD) Decisions |
Mattel, Inc. v. collector cars a/k/a
Mario Carrizales a/k/a GEO a/k/a Geo Scoonmaker
Claim
Number: FA0403000243500
Complainant is Mattel, Inc. (“Complainant”), represented
by William Dunnegan, of Perkins & Dunnegan,
45 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10111.
Respondent is collector cars a/k/a Mario Carrizales a/k/a
GEO a/k/a Geo Scoonmaker (“Respondent”), 910 Alta Drive, Valparasio,
IN 46385.
REGISTRAR
AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAME
The
domain name at issue is <hotwheelsdreams.com>, registered with Register.com.
The
undersigned certifies that he has acted independently and impartially and to
the best of his knowledge has no known conflict in
serving as Panelist in this
proceeding.
John
J. Upchurch as Panelist.
Complainant
submitted a Complaint to the National Arbitration Forum (the "Forum")
electronically on March 2, 2004; the Forum
received a hard copy of the
Complaint on March 3, 2004.
On
March 2, 2004, Register.com confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the domain
name <hotwheelsdreams.com> is registered with Register.com and
that Respondent is the current registrant of the name. Register.com has
verified that Respondent
is bound by the Register.com registration agreement
and has thereby agreed to resolve domain-name disputes brought by third parties
in accordance with ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the
"Policy").
On
March 9, 2004, a Notification of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative
Proceeding (the "Commencement Notification"),
setting a deadline of
March 29, 2004 by which Respondent could file a Response to the Complaint, was
transmitted to Respondent via
e-mail, post and fax, to all entities and persons
listed on Respondent's registration as technical, administrative and billing
contacts,
and to postmaster@hotwheelsdreams.com by e-mail.
Having
received no Response from Respondent, using the same contact details and
methods as were used for the Commencement Notification,
the Forum transmitted
to the parties a Notification of Respondent Default.
On
April 5, 2004, pursuant to Complainant's request to have the dispute decided by
a single-member Panel, the Forum appointed John
J. Upchurch as Panelist.
Having
reviewed the communications records, the Administrative Panel (the "Panel")
finds that the Forum has discharged its
responsibility under Paragraph 2(a) of
the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the
"Rules") "to
employ reasonably available means calculated to
achieve actual notice to Respondent."
Therefore, the Panel may issue its decision based on the documents
submitted and in accordance with the ICANN Policy, ICANN Rules,
the Forum's
Supplemental Rules and any rules and principles of law that the Panel deems
applicable, without the benefit of any Response
from Respondent.
Complainant
requests that the domain name be transferred from Respondent to Complainant.
A. Complainant makes the following assertions:
1. Respondent’s <hotwheelsdreams.com>
domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s HOT WHEELS mark.
2. Respondent does not have any rights or
legitimate interests in the <hotwheelsdreams.com> domain name.
3. Respondent registered and used the <hotwheelsdreams.com>
domain name in bad faith.
B. Respondent failed to submit a Response in
this proceeding.
Complainant
holds several registrations with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”)
for the HOT WHEELS mark, including Reg.
Nos. 843,156 and 884,563 (registered on
January 30, 1968 and January 20, 1970, respectively). Complainant uses the <hotwheels.com> and
<hotwheelscollectors.com> domain names in conjunction with its
business.
Respondent
registered the <hotwheelsdreams.com> domain name on March 30,
2002. Respondent uses the domain name
to direct Internet users to a commercial website that sells collectible
“Hotwheels, Scorchin Scooters,
Blast Lanes and more.” Moreover, Respondent offered to sell the domain name to
Complainant for $5,500.
Paragraph 15(a)
of the Rules instructs this Panel to "decide a complaint on the basis of
the statements and documents submitted
in accordance with the Policy, these
Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable."
In view of
Respondent's failure to submit a Response, the Panel shall decide this
administrative proceeding on the basis of Complainant's
undisputed
representations pursuant to paragraphs 5(e), 14(a) and 15(a) of the Rules and
draw such inferences it considers appropriate
pursuant to paragraph 14(b) of
the Rules.
Paragraph 4(a)
of the Policy requires that Complainant must prove each of the following three
elements to obtain an order that a domain
name should be cancelled or
transferred:
(1) the domain name registered by Respondent
is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which
Complainant has
rights; and
(2) Respondent has no rights or legitimate
interests in respect of the domain name; and
(3) the domain name has been registered and
is being used in bad faith.
Complainant has
established rights in the HOT WHEELS mark through registration with the
USPTO. See Men’s Wearhouse, Inc. v.
Wick, FA 117861 (Nat. Arb. Forum Sept. 16, 2002) (“Under U.S. trademark
law, registered marks hold a presumption that they are inherently
distinctive
and have acquired secondary meaning.”); see also Janus Int’l Holding Co. v. Rademacher, D2002-0201 (WIPO Mar. 5,
2002) (finding that Panel decisions have held that registration of a mark is prima facie evidence of validity, which
creates a rebuttable presumption that the mark is inherently distinctive. Respondent has the burden of refuting this
assumption).
Respondent’s <hotwheelsdreams.com>
domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant’s HOT WHEELS mark because
the domain name fully incorporates the mark and merely
omits the space between
the words of the mark and adds the generic word “dreams.” The omission of the space between the words
of the mark and the addition of the generic term “dreams” is insufficient to
distinguish
the domain name from the mark.
See Hannover Ruckversicherungs-AG v. Ryu, FA 102724
(Nat. Arb. Forum Jan. 7, 2002) (finding <hannoverre.com> to be identical
to HANNOVER RE, “as spaces are impermissible
in domain names and a generic
top-level domain such as ‘.com’ or ‘.net’ is required in domain names”); see
also Wembley Nat’l Stadium Ltd. v.
Thomson, D2000-1233 (WIPO Nov. 16, 2000) (finding that the domain name
<wembleystadium.net> is identical to the WEMBLEY STADIUM mark);
see
also Am. Online, Inc. v. Anytime Online Traffic School, FA 146930
(Nat. Arb. Forum April 11, 2003) (finding that Respondent’s domain names, which
incorporated Complainant’s entire mark
and merely added the descriptive terms “traffic school,” “defensive driving,”
and “driver improvement”
did not add any distinctive features capable of
overcoming a claim of confusing similarity); see also Space Imaging LLC v. Brownwell, AF-0298 (eResolution Sept. 22, 2000) (finding confusing
similarity where Respondent’s domain name combines Complainant’s mark with
a
generic term that has an obvious relationship to Complainant’s business).
Furthermore, the
addition of the generic top-level domain “.com” to the mark is irrelevant in
determining whether the domain name
is confusingly similar to Complainant’s
mark. See Pomellato S.p.A v. Tonetti, D2000-0493 (WIPO July 7, 2000)
(finding <pomellato.com> identical to Complainant’s mark because the
generic top-level domain
(gTLD) “.com” after the name POMELLATO is not
relevant); see also Rollerblade,
Inc. v. McCrady, D2000-0429 (WIPO June 25, 2000) (finding that the top
level of the domain name such as “.net” or “.com” does not affect the domain
name for the purpose of determining whether it is identical or confusingly
similar).
The Panel finds
that Policy ¶ 4(a)(i) has been satisfied.
Respondent has
failed to submit a Response; therefore, the Panel may accept all reasonable
allegations and inferences in the Complaint
as true. See Vertical Solutions Mgmt., Inc. v. webnet-marketing, inc.,
FA 95095 (Nat. Arb. Forum July 31, 2000) (holding that Respondent’s failure to
respond allows all reasonable inferences of fact in
the allegations of
Complainant to be deemed true); see also Charles Jourdan Holding AG v. AAIM, D2000-0403 (WIPO June 27,
2000) (finding it appropriate for the Panel to draw adverse inferences from
Respondent’s failure to reply
to the Complaint).
Due to
Respondent’s failure to contest the allegations of the Complaint, the Panel
presumes that Respondent lacks rights and legitimate
interests in the <hotwheelsdreams.com>
domain name. See Parfums Christian Dior v. QTR Corp.,
D2000-0023 (WIPO Mar. 9, 2000) (finding that by not submitting a Response,
Respondent has failed to invoke any circumstance which
could demonstrate any rights
or legitimate interests in the domain name); see also Pavillion Agency, Inc. v. Greenhouse Agency
Ltd., D2000-1221 (WIPO Dec. 4, 2000) (finding that Respondents’ failure to
respond can be construed as an admission that they have no
legitimate interest
in the domain names).
Furthermore,
nothing in the record establishes that Respondent is commonly known by the <hotwheelsdreams.com>
domain name. Moreover, Respondent
is not licensed or authorized to register or use domain names that incorporate
Complainant’s mark. Therefore, the
Panel concludes that Respondent lacks rights and legitimate interests in the
domain name pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(c)(ii).
See Tercent Inc. v. Yi, FA 139720
(Nat. Arb. Forum Feb. 10, 2003) (stating “nothing in Respondent’s WHOIS information
implies that Respondent is ‘commonly
known by’ the disputed domain name” as one
factor in determining that Policy ¶ 4(c)(ii) does not apply); see also Charles Jourdan Holding AG v. AAIM,
D2000-0403 (WIPO June 27, 2000) (finding no rights or legitimate interests
where (1) Respondent is not a licensee of Complainant;
(2) Complainant’s prior
rights in the domain name precede Respondent’s registration; (3) Respondent is
not commonly known by the
domain name in question).
Complainant
asserts that Respondent commercially benefits from the goodwill associated with
Complainant’s mark by incorporating the
mark into the domain name and using it
to direct Internet users to a commercial website. Due to Respondent’s failure to contest the assertion, the Panel
accepts Complainant’s assertion as true and finds such use does not
constitute
a bona fide offering of goods or services pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(c)(i) or a
legitimate noncommercial or fair use pursuant
to Policy ¶ 4(c)(iii). See MSNBC Cable, LLC v. Tysys.com, D2000-1204 (WIPO Dec. 8, 2000)
(finding no rights or legitimate interests in the famous MSNBC mark where
Respondent attempted to
profit using Complainant’s mark by redirecting Internet
traffic to its own website); see also Imation Corp. v. Streut, FA
125759 (Nat. Arb. Forum Nov. 8, 2002) (finding no rights or legitimate
interests where Respondnet used the disputed domain name
to redirect Internet
users to an online casino).
In addition,
Respondent’s attempt to sell the <hotwheelsdreams.com> domain name
to Complainant for more than Respondent’s out-of-pocket costs is further
evidence that Respondent lacks rights and legitimate
interests in the domain
name. See Am. Nat’l Red Cross v. Domains, FA 143684
(Nat. Arb. Forum Mar. 4, 2003) (stating that “Respondent’s lack of rights and legitimate interests in the
domain name is further evidenced by Respondent’s attempt to sell its domain
name registration to Complainant, the rightful holder of the RED CROSS mark”); see
also Mothers Against Drunk Driving v. Shin, FA 154098 (Nat. Arb.
Forum May 27, 2003) (holding that under the circumstances, Respondent’s
apparent willingness to dispose of
its rights in the disputed domain
name suggested that it lacked rights or legitimate interests in the domain
name).
The Panel finds
that Policy ¶ 4(a)(ii) has been satisfied.
Respondent’s
commercial use of a domain name confusingly similar to Complainant’s mark is
evidence of bad faith use and registration
pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(b)(iv). See G.D. Searle & Co. v. Celebrex
Drugstore, FA 123933 (Nat. Arb. Forum Nov. 21, 2002) (finding that
Respondent registered and used the domain name in bad faith pursuant to
Policy
¶ 4(b)(iv) because Respondent was using the confusingly similar domain name to
attract Internet users to its commercial website);
see also Kmart v.
Khan, FA 127708 (Nat. Arb. Forum Nov. 22, 2002) (finding that if Respondent
profits from its diversionary use of Complainant's mark when
the domain name
resolves to commercial websites and Respondent fails to contest the Complaint,
it may be concluded that Respondent
is using the domain name in bad faith
pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(b)(iv)); see also H-D Michigan, Inc. v.
Petersons Auto., FA 135608 (Nat. Arb. Forum Jan. 8, 2003) (finding that the
disputed domain name was registered and used in bad faith pursuant to
Policy ¶
4(b)(iv) through Respondent’s registration and use of the infringing domain
name to intentionally attempt to attract Internet
users to its fraudulent
website by using Complainant’s famous marks and likeness).
Furthermore,
Respondent attempted to sell to Complainant a domain name that is confusingly
similar to Complainant’s mark for more
than out-of-pocket costs. Respondent’s offer to sell the <hotwheelsdreams.com>
domain name to Complainant for more than out-of-pocket costs is evidence of
bad faith registration and use pursuant to Policy ¶ 4(b)(i). See World Wrestling Fed’n Entmt., Inc. v.
Bosman, D99-0001 (WIPO Jan. 14, 2000) (finding that Respondent used the
domain name in bad faith because he offered to sell the domain name
for
valuable consideration in excess of any out-of-pocket costs); see also Dynojet Research, Inc. v. Norman,
AF-0316 (eResolution Sept. 26, 2000) (finding that Respondent demonstrated bad
faith when he requested monetary compensation beyond
out-of-pocket costs in
exchange for the registered domain name); see also Am. Online, Inc. v. Prijic, FA 112639 (Nat. Arb. Forum June 27, 2002) (“[I]n
determining whether Respondent has sought consideration in excess of its
out-of-pocket
costs, the Policy makes clear that only costs related to the
domain name are to be considered, and not those related to the creation
or
maintenance of the connected website”).
The Panel finds
that Policy ¶ 4(a)(iii) has been satisfied.
Having
established all three elements required under the ICANN Policy, the Panel
concludes that relief shall be GRANTED.
Accordingly, it
is Ordered that the <hotwheelsdreams.com> domain name be TRANSFERRED
from Respondent to Complainant.
John
J. Upchurch, Panelist
Dated: April 14, 2004
WorldLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/GENDND/2004/466.html