|
|
[Home]
[Databases]
[Search]
[Feedback]
Project on International Courts and Tribunals (PICT) Resources |
[Database Search] [Name Search] [Recent Documents] [Noteup] [Help]
Last update 03/01/04
WTO/GATT Dispute Settlement
System – Selected Bibliography
Ahn,
D., “Environmental disputes in the GATT/WTO: before and after
US--Shrimp {WTO Appellate Body Report in re United States--Import Prohibition
of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (Shrimp-Turtles case), {1998} 38 I.L.M.
121} case,” 20(4)
— “Korea in the GATT/WTO dispute
settlement system: legal battle for economic development,”
6(3) Journal of
International Economic Law 597-633 (September 2003).
Akakwam, Philip A., “The standard of review in
the 1994 Antidumping Code: circumscribing the role of GATT Panels in reviewing
national
antidumping determinations,” 5
Akande,
D., et. al., “International Adjudication on National Security Issues:
What Role for the WTO?,” 43(2)
Ala’i,
P., “Judicial lobbying at the WTO: the debate over the use of
amicus curiae briefs and the U.S. experience,” 24(1/2)
Fordham
International Law Journal 62-94
(November/December 2000).
— “Free trade or sustainable development? An analysis of the WTO appellate body's shift to a more balanced approach to trade liberalization,” 14(4) American University International Law Review 1129-71 (1999).
Aldonas, Grant D., “The World Trade Organisation: Revolution in International Dispute Settlement,” 50 Dispute Resolution Journal 73 (1995).
Alter, Karen, “Resolving or Exacerbating Disputes? The WTO’s New Dispute Resolution System,” 79(4) International Affairs 783-800 (2003).
Anderson, Andrew D., Seeking common ground: Canada‑U.S. trade dispute settlement policies in the nineties (Boulder, Colo. Westview Press, 1995).
Appleton, Arthur, E., “Amicus Curaie Submissions in the Carbon Steel Case: Another Rabbit from the Appellate Body’s Hat?,” 3 Journal of International Economic Law 91-100 (2000).
— “Shrimp/Turtle (WTO Appellate Body
Report in re United States--Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp
Products (Shrimp-Turtles
Case), {1998} 37 I.L.M. 832}: untangling the nets,”
2(3) Journal of
International Economic Law 477-96 (September 1999).
Bartels,
L., “Article XX of GATT and the Problem of Extraterritorial
Jurisdiction: The Case of Trade Measures for the Protection of Human Rights,”
36(2) Journal of
World Trade 353-403
(April 2002).
— “Applicable law in WTO dispute settlement proceedings,” 35(3) Journal of World Trade 499-519 (June 2001).
—
& Alan F Holmer, “Dispute resolution in the
New World Trade Organisation: Concerns and Net Benefits,” 28 International Lawyer 1095
(1994).
Beneyto, Jose M., “The EU and the WTO: direct effect of the new dispute settlement system?,” 7 Europaische Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsrecht 295‑299 (1996) [summary In German].
Benke,
R.T.J., “List of WTO dispute settlement cases on ‘trade remedies’,”
6(1) Journal of
International Economic Law
171-4 (March 2003).
Berger,
Joseph Robert, “Unilateral
trade measures to conserve the world's living resources : an environmental
breakthrough for the GATT in the WTO Sea Turtle
Case” 24
Bernazani,
J.A., “The eagle, the turtle, the shrimp and the WTO {WTO
Appellate Body Report in re United States--Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp
and Shrimp Products (Shrimp-Turtles Case), {1998} 38 I.L.M. 121}: implications
for the future of environmental trade measures,” 15(1/2)
Connecticut Journal
of International Law 207-33
(Winter/Spring 2000).
Bhagwati, J.N., “After Seattle: free trade and the WTO,” 77(1) International Affairs 15-29 (January 2001).
Bhala, Raj ,World Trade Law: The GATT-WTO
System, Regional Arrangements, and
Blokker, N. M., “De WTO Appellate Body en haar eerste zaak” 44 SEW. Sociaal‑economische wetgeving 339-345 (1996).
Bogdandy, Armin von, Petros C. Mavroidis & Yves
Mény (eds.), European integration and international co-ordination: studies
in transnational economic law in honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (
Borght, Kim van der, “The review of the WTO understanding on dispute settlement: some reflections on the current debate,” 14 American University InternationalLaw Review 14 1223-1243 (1999).
Bourgeois,
Jacques H.J., “Comment on a WTO permanent panel body
[Discussion of William
J. Davey, The Case for a WTO Permanent Panel Body],” 6(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 211-4 (March 2003).
—
“Some
reflections on the WTO dispute settlement system from a practitioner’s
perspective,” 4(1) Journal of International Economic Law 145-54 (March 2001).
— “WTO dispute
settlement in the field of anti‑dumping law,” 1 Journal of
International Economic Law. 259‑276 (1998).
Brewer,
T.L., et. al., “WTO disputes and developing countries,”
33(5) Journal of
World Trade 169-82
(October 1999).
Brimeyer,
B.L., “Bananas, beef, and compliance in the World Trade
Organization: the inability of the WTO dispute settlement process to achieve
compliance
from superpower nations,” 10(1)
Bronckers, Marco & Reinhard Quick (eds.), New
directions in international economic law: essays in honour of John H. Jackson
(
Brotmann,
M., “The clash between the WTO and the ESA: drowning a turtle
to eat a shrimp {WTO Appellate Body Report in re United States--Import
Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (Shrimp-Turtles Case), {1998}
37 I.L.M. 832},” 16(2) Pace Environmental Law Review 321-52 (Summer 1999).
Brown, James E., “The World Trade Organization, the North American Free Trade Agreement, and the Canadian‑US Free Trade Agreement: dispute resolution procedures and the environment,” in: Szasz, Paul C. (ed.), Administrative and expert monitoring of international treaties (Ardsley, NY, 1999), pp. 165‑189.
Busch,
M.L., et. al., “Bargaining in the shadow of the law: early settlement in
GATT/WTO disputes,” 24(1/2) Fordham International Law
Journal 158-72
(November/December 2000).
Bustamante,
Rodrigo, “The need for a GATT
doctrine of Locus Standi : why the
Cameron, J., et. al., “Principles of international law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body,” 50 The International & Comparative Law Quarterly 248-98 (April 2001).
— &
Karen Campbell (eds.), Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organisation
(London: Cameron May, 1998).
Campbell, N., et. al., “The contribution of WTO appellate review to a rule-based world trading system,” 4(1) Canadian International Lawyer 42-8 (June 2000).
Carmody,
C., “Remedies and Conformity Under the WTO Agreement,”
5(2) Journal of
International Economic Law 307-29 (June 2002).
—
“Public
participation in WTO dispute settlement: stay tuned,”
4(3) Canadian
International Lawyer 125-30
(June 2001).
Cartland,
M., “Comment on a WTO permanent panel body,”
6(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 214-8 (March 2003).
Cavalier,
G.A., “A call for interim relief at the WTO level: dispute
settlement and international trade diplomacy,” 22(3)
World Competition
103-39 (September
1999).
Champ,
P., et. al., “Patent Rights and Local Working under the WTO TRIPS
Agreement: an Analysis of the U.S.-Brazil Patent Dispute,”
27(2) The Yale
Journal of International Law 365-93 (Summer 2002).
Chang,
S.W., “Comment on a WTO permanent panel body,”
6(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 219-24 (March 2003).
Chaytor, Beatrice, “Dispute settlement under the GATT/WTO: the experience of developing countries,” in: Cameron & Campbell (eds.), Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organisation (London: Cameron May, 1998), pp. 250-269.
Ching, Maria Martha, “Evaluating the Effectiveness of the GATT Dispute Settlement System for Developing Countries,” 16 World Competition 105-111 (1993).
Cho, Sung Yoon, “GATT non‑violation issues in the WTO framework: are they the Achilles’ heel of the dispute settlement process?” 39 Harvard International Law Journal 311-355 (1998).
Choinski,
A.S., “Anatomy of a controversy: the balance of political forces
behind implementation of the WTO’s gasoline decision,”
33(4) Law and
Policy in International Business 569-613 (Summer 2002).
Christoforou,
T., “Settlement of science-based trade disputes in the WTO: a
critical review of the developing case law in the face of scientific
uncertainty,” 8(3) New York University Environmental Law Journal 622-48 (2000).
Chua,
Clark,
H.R., “The WTO Banana Dispute Settlement and Its Implications for
Trade Relations between the United States and the European Union,”
35(2) Cornell
International Law Journal 291-306 (Fall 2002).
Clough,
M., “The WTO dispute settlement system--a practitioner
perspective,” 24(1/2) Fordham International Law Journal 252-74 (November/December
2000).
Cone,
S.M.I., The Asbestos case {WTO Appellate Body Report in re
European Communities--Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing
Products,
WT/DS135/AB/R (WTO Mar. 12, 2001)} and dispute settlement in the
World Trade Organization: the uneasy relationship between panels
and the
Appellate Body, 23(1) Michigan Journal of International Law 103-42 (Fall 2001).
—
“The Appellate
Body, the protection of sea turtles and the technique of ‘completing the
analysis’,” 33(2) Journal of World Trade 51-62 (April 1999).
Cottier,
T., “The WTO permanent panel body: a bridge too far?,”
6(1) Journal of
International Economic Law
187-202 (March 2003).
Cottier, Thomas, “Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization: characteristics and structural implications for the European Union,” 35 Common Market Law Review 325-378 (1998).
Covelli,
Nick, “Member Intervention in World Trade Organization Dispute
Settlement Proceedings After EC--Sardines: The Rules, Jurisprudence, and
Controversy,” 37(3) Journal of World Trade 673-90 (June 2003).
— “Public international law and third party participation in WTO panel proceedings,” 33(2) Journal of World Trade 125-39 (April 1999).
Croley, Steven P. & John H. Jackson, “WTO dispute procedures, standard of review, and deferrence to national governments,” 90 American Journal of International Law 193-213 (1996).
Curti,
A.M., “The WTO dispute settlement understanding: an unlikely
weapon in the fight against AIDS,” 27(4) American Journal of Law
& Medicine 469-85
(2001).
Cutajar, Michael Zammit, UNCTAD and the South-North Dialogue: The First Twenty Years (New York: Pergamon Press, 1985).
Davey,
W.J., “Introduction: mini-symposium on the desirability of a WTO
permanent penal body,” 6(1) Journal of International
Economic Law 175-6
(March 2003).
—
“The case for
a WTO permanent panel body,” 6(1) Journal of International
Economic Law 177-86
(March 2003).
— “Has the WTO dispute settlement system
exceeded its authority? A consideration of deference shown by the system to
member government
decisions and its use of issue-avoidance techniques,”
4(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 79-110 (March 2001).
— “The WTO dispute settlement system,”
3(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 15-18 (March 2000).
De
Bievre, D., “Redesigning the Virtuous Circle: Two Proposals for World
Trade Organization Reform,” 36(5) Journal of World Trade 1005-13 (October 2002).
Decker,
D. Christopher, “International
trade and environmental law: brothers in the expansion of international law or
Cain versus Abel?,” 5
Decker,
U., “The three step test: international standards for
limitations in copyright guidelines issued by a WTO dispute settlement decision,”
107 Copyright World
25-7 (February 2001).
Dehousse,
F., et. al., “The EU-US dispute concerning the new American rules of
origin for textile products,” 36(1) Journal of World Trade
67-8 (February 2002).
Dunne,
M.S.I., “Redefining power orientation: a reassessment of Jackson’s
paradigm in light of asymmetries of power, negotiation, and compliance
in the
GATT/WTO dispute settlement system,” 34(1) Law and Policy in
International Business 277-342 (Fall 2002).
Eeckhout, P., “Judicial enforcement of WTO law in the European Union--some further reflections,” 5(1) Journal of International Economic Law 91-110 (March 2002).
Ehlermann,
C., “Experiences from the WTO Appellate Body,”
38(3)
—
et.
al., “WTO dispute settlement and competition law: views from the
perspective of the appellate body’s experience” 26(6)
Fordham
International Law Journal 1505-61
(June 2003).
Esserman,
S., et. al., “The WTO on Trial,” 82(1) Foreign Affairs 130-140 (January/February
2003).
Ferrante, Alison Raina, “The dolphin/tuna controversy and environmental issues: will the World Trade Organization’s ‘Arbitration Court’ and the International Court of Justice’s Chamber for Environmental Matters assist the United States and the world in furthering environmental goals?,” 5 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 279-313 (1996).
Finger, Michael J. & L. Alan Winters, “What can the WTO do for developing countries?,” in: Krueger, Anne O. (ed.) The WTO as an International Organization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), pp. 365-401.
Footer,
M.E., “Developing country practice in the matter of WTO dispute
settlement,” 35(1) Journal of World Trade 55-98 (February 2001).
Gaffney, John P., “Due process in the World Trade Organization : the need for procedural justice in the dispute settlement system,” 14 American University International Law Review 1173-1221 (1999).
Gantz, David A., “Dispute settlement under the NAFTA and the WTO: choice of forum opportunities and risks for the NAFTA parties,” 14(4) American University International Law Review 1025-106 (1999).
Gao,
L., “What Makes a Lawyer in China? The Chinese Legal Education
System after China’s Entry into the WTO,” 10(1)
Geuze,
Matthijs & Hannu Wagner, “WTO dispute settlement practice relating to the TRIPS
agreement,” 2(2) Journal of International Economic Law 347-84 (June 1999).
Girouard,
R.J., “Water Export Restrictions: A Case Study of WTO Dispute
Settlement Strategies and Outcomes,” 15(2)
Gleason,
C.B., et. al., “The WTO dispute settlement implementation procedures: a
system in need of reform,” 31(3) Law and Policy in
International Business 709-36
(Spring 2000).
Goh,
Gavin, “Australia’s Participation in the WTO Dispute Settlement
System,” 30(1) Federal Law Review 203-15 (2002).
—
et.
al., “An introduction to the WTO dispute settlement system,”
30(1)
—
& Andreas R Ziegler, “A real world where
people live and work and die: Australian SPS measures after the WTO Appellate
Body’s
Decision in the Hormones Case,” 32 Journal of World Trade 271-290 (1998).
Goldman, Julie, “Bad lawyering or ulterior motive? : Why the United States lost the film case before the WTO dispute settlement panel,” 30 Law and Policy in International Business 417-437 (1999).
Gonzalez-Calatayud,
A., et. al., “The Relationship between the Dispute-Settlement Mechanisms
of MEAs and those of the WTO,” 11(3) Review of European Community
and International Environmental Law 275-86 (2002).
Grane,
P., “Remedies under WTO law,” 4(4) Journal of International
Economic Law 755-72
(December 2001).
Greenwald,
J., “WTO dispute settlement: an exercise in trade law
legislation?,” 6(1) Journal of International Economic Law 113-26 (March 2003).
Griller,
S., “Judicial enforceability of WTO law in the European Union
annotation to Case C-149/96, Portugal v. Council {{1999} E.C.R. I-8395},”
3(3) Journal of
International Economic Law 441-72 (September 2000).
Hallstrom, Par, The GATT panels and the
formation of international trade law (
Hecht,
J.C., “Operation of WTO dispute settlement panels: assessing
proposals for reform,” 31(3) Law and Policy in
International Business 657-63
(Spring 2000).
Herman, Andrew D., “The WTO Dispute Settlement Review Commission: an unwise extension of extrajudicial roles,” 47 The Hastings Law Journal 1635-1667 (1996).
Hernandez-Lopez, E., “Recent trends and perspectives for non-state actor participation in World Trade Organization disputes,” 35(3) Journal of World Trade 469-98 (June 2001).
Hess,
G., “ACC remains hopeful on high stakes trade dispute
[between
Hilf, Meinhard, “Der WTO‑ Panel be richt im EG/USA Hormonstreit: AnstoB zurn grenzenlosen Weltbinnenmarkt fur Lebensmittel oder Eigentor der WTO? 8 Europaische Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsrecht 559-566 (1997).
Hoekman,
Bernard M.& Will Martin (eds.), Developing countries and the WTO:
a pro-active agenda (
—
et
al., “WTO dispute settlement, transparency and surveillance,”
23(4) World Economy
5270-42 (April 2000).
Horlick,
G.N., et. al., “A problem of process in WTO jurisprudence: identifying
disputed issues in panels and consultations,” 31(3)
Law and Policy in
International Business 573-82
(Spring 2000).
Howse, Robert, “Membership and its Privileges: the WTO, Civil Society, and the Amicus Brief Controversy,” 9(4) European Law Journal 496-510 (September 2003).
—
“The Most Dangerous Branch? The Scope and Limits
of Judicial Power in the WTO,” in: Thomas Cottier & Petros C. Mavrodis
(eds.),
The Role of the Judge in International Trade Law (
— “Adjudicative
Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early
Years of WTO Jurisprudence,” in: Joseph
H.H. Weiler (ed.), The EU, the WTO,
and the NAFTA (
Hudec,
R.E., “The new WTO dispute settlement procedure: an overview of
the first three years,” 81
—
Enforcing International Trade Law: The
Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System (Salem, N.H.: Butterworth Legal
Publishers, 1993).
—
Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System
(London: Trade Policy Research Centre, 1987).
Hughes,
Layla, “Limiting the jurisdiction
of dispute settlement panels: the WTO Appellate Body Beef Hormone Decision,” 10
Ierley,
D., “Defining the factors that influence developing country
compliance with and participation in the WTO dispute settlement system: another
look at the dispute over bananas,” 33(4) Law and Policy in
International Business 615-51
(Summer 2002).
Iida,
K., “Why Does the World Trade Organization Appear Neoliberal?
The Puzzle of the High Incidence of Guilty Verdicts in WTO Adjudication,”
23(1) Journal of
Public Policy 1-21
(January/April 2003).
International
Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (ed.), Strengthening relations
with Arab and Islamic countries through international law: e-commerce, the WTO
dispute settlement mechanism,
and foreign investment; papers emanating from the
Fourth PCA International Law Seminar, October 12, 2001 (Kluwer Law
International, 2002)/
Iwasawa,
Yuji, “WTO Dispute Settlement as Judicial Supervision,”
5(2) Journal of
International Economic Law 287-305 (June 2002).
—
“Settlement of disputes concerning the WTO
Agreement: various means other than panel procedures,” in: Young, Michael K.
(ed.) Trilateral perspectives on international legal issues. ( Irvington,
NY, 1996), pp. 77‑402.
Jackson,
John H., et. al., “Introduction: WTO cases on U.S. ‘trade remedies’,”
6(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 111 (March 2003).
—
The jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO (
— “Dispute
Settlement and the WTO: Emerging Problems”, in Jackson, J., From GATT to the
WTO (Kluwer,
— Designing and implementing effective dispute settlement procedures: WTO dispute settlement, appraisal and prospects, in: Krueger (1998), pp. 161-180.
— The World Trade Organization: Constitution and Jurisprudence (London: Royal Institute for International Affairs,1998)
— The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1997).
— “The WTO dispute settlement understanding misunderstandings on the nature of legal obligation 91 The American Journal of International Law 60-64 (1997).
— “The Legal Meaning of a GATT Dispute Settlement Report: Some Reflections,” in: Niels Blokker and Sam Muller (eds.), Towards More Effective Supervision by International Organisations 149‑164 (Dordrecht; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994).
— Restructuring the GATT System (New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1990).
Joergens,
Konstantin J., “True appellate procedure or only a two stage process? A
comparative view of the appellate body under the WTO dispute settlement
understanding,” 30(2) Law and Policy in International Business 193-229 (Winter 1999).
Joseph,
A.L., “The banana split: has the stalemate been broken in the WTO
banana dispute? The global trade community's “a-peel” for justice,”
24(1/2) Fordham
International Law Journal 744-99 (November/December 2000).
Jung,
Y., “Modelling a WTO dispute settlement mechanism in an
international antitrust agreement: an impossible dream?”
34(1) Journal of
World Trade 89-110
(February 2000).
Kelemen,
R.D., “The limits of judicial power: trade-environment disputes
in the GATT/WTO and the EU,” 34(6) Comparative Political
Studies 622-50
(August 2001).
Kerr,
W.A., et. al., “The North American--European Union dispute over beef
produced using growth hormones: a major test for the new international trade
regime,” 25(2) World Economy 283-96 (February 2002).
Kim,
H.C., “The WTO dispute settlement process: a primer,”
2(3) Journal of
International Economic Law 457-76 (September 1999).
Kim,
J.B., “Fair price comparison in the WTO anti-dumping agreement:
recent WTO panel decisions against the ‘zeroing’ method,”
36(1) Journal of
World Trade 39-56
(February 2002).
Komuro, Norio, “Kodak‑Fuji Film dispute and the WTO Panel ruling,” 32 Journal of World Trade 161-217 (1998).
Kofi Oteng, Kufour, “From GATT to the WTO – The Developing Countries and Reform of the Procedures for the Settlement of International Trade Disputes”, 31 Journal of World Trade (1997).
Kong,
Q., “Can the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism Resolve Trade
Disputes between China and Taiwan?,” 5(3) Journal of International Economic
Law 747-58
(September 2002).
Krueger, Anne O. (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Kuilwijk, Kees Jan, “The European Court of Justice and the GATT dilemma : public interest versus individual rights?” (Critical European studies series) (Beuningen: Nexed Ed., 1996).
Kuschel, Hans‑Dieter, “Bananenstreit.und kein Ende? Entscheidung des WTO‑Streitbeilegungsgremiums zur Einfuhrregelung der EG,” 44 Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft 122-27 (1998)
Lacarte,
J., “Comment on a WTO permanent panel body,”
6(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 227-30 (March 2003).
Lacarte-Muro,
J., et. al., “Developing countries and the WTO legal and dispute
settlement system: a view from the bench,” 3(3) Journal of International
Economic Law 395-401
(September 2000).
Laidhold,
M., “Private party access to the WTO: do recent developments in
international trade dispute resolution really give private organizations
a
voice in the WTO?,” 12(2) Transnational Lawyer
427-50 (Fall 1999).
Langbein,
S.I., “Income tax--U.S. foreign sales corporation tax
practices--GATT Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures--GATT
Agreement
on Agriculture--effect on appeal of failure to raise issue before WTO
dispute resolution panel,” 94(3) American Journal of
International Law 546-55
(July 2000).
Lee,
Y., “Revival of grey-area measures? The US-Canada softwood
lumber agreement: conflict with the WTO agreement on safeguards,”
36(1) Journal of
World Trade 155-65
(February 2002).
Leitner,
K., et. al., “WTO dispute settlement 1995-2002: a statistical analysis,”
6(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 251-61 (March 2003).
Lennard, M., “Navigating by the stars: interpreting the WTO agreements,” 5(1) Journal of International Economic Law 17-89 (March 2002).
Lennard, M., “Which is the wolf and which is the lamb?: Australia confronts US before WTO,” 74(4) Australian Law Journal 217-20 (April 2000).
Lowenfeld, A P., “Remedies along with rights:
institutional reform in the new GATT,” 88
American Journal of International
Law 447 (1994).
Lu
Pi, “Using WTO rules to resolve trade disputes,”
45(15) Beijing
Review 18-19
(
MacCrory, Martin A., “Clearing the air: the Clean Air Act, GATT and the WTO’s reformulated gasoline decision,” 17 UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 1-44 (1998/99).
MacLarty, Taunya L., “GATT 1994 dispute
settlement: sacrificing diplomacy for efficiency in the multilateral trading
system?,” 9
MacNiel,
Dale E., “The first case
under the WTO’s Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement: the European Union’s
hormone ban,” 39
Makki, Fadi A., “African Countries and the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism,” Address at the Eight Annual Conference of the African Society of International and Comparative Law 43-47 (Sept. 2-4, 1996).
Marceau,
Gabrielle, “WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights,”
13(4) European
Journal of International
Law 753-814 (September
2002).
—
“A call for
coherence in international law; praises for the prohibition against ‘clinical
isolation’ in WTO dispute settlement, 33(5) Journal of World Trade
87-152 (October 1999).
—
“NAFTA
and WTO dispute settlement rules: a thematic comparison,” 31 Journal of
World Trade 25-81 (1997).
Martha, Rutsel Silvestre J., “The Capacity to Sue and be Sued under WTO Law” (forthcoming in World Trade Review, March 2004).
—
“The Duty to Exercise Judgment on the
Fruitfulness of Actions in World Trade Law,” 35 (5) Journal of World Trade
1035-1059 (2001).
—
“Representation of Parties in World Trade Disputes,”
31(2) Journal of World Trade 83-96 (1997).
—
“Precedent in World Trade Law,” XLV
—
“Presumptions and Burden of Proof in World Trade
Law,” 14 Journal of International Arbitration (1997).
—
“World Trade Dispute Settlement and the
Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule,” 30 Journal of World Trade (1996).
Mavroidis,
Petros C., “Remedies in the WTO legal system: between a rock and a
hard place,” 11(4) European Journal of International Law 763-813 (December 2000).
—
“Is
the WTO dispute settlement mechanism responsive to the needs of the traders?
Would a system of direct action by private parties
yield better results?: Panel
Discussion,” 32 Journal of World Trade 147-165 (1998).
McBride,
S., “Dispute settlement in the WTO: backbone of the global
trading system or delegation of awesome power?,” 32(3)
Law and Policy in
International Business 643-75
(Spring 2001).
McConnell,
M., “From relationships to rules: a comment on China’s
accession to the WTO in response to Pitman Potter’s article ‘China and the WTO:
tensions between globalized liberalism and local culture,’
[32 no3 Can. Bus. L.J.
440-62 D 1999], 32(3) Canadian
Business Law Journal 463-73
(December 1999).
McGivern,
B.P., “Seeking Compliance with WTO Rulings: Theory, Practice and
Alternatives,” 36(1) The International Lawyer 141-57 (Spring 2002).
McLaughlin,
R.J., “Sovereignty, utility, and fairness: using U.S. takings law
to guide the evolving utilitarian balancing approach to global environmental
disputes in the WTO,” 78(4)
McNelis,
N., “The role of the judge in the EU and WTO lessons from the
BSE {United Kingdom v. Commission, {1998} E.C.R. 2265} and Hormones {WTO
Appellate Body Report in re European Communities--Measures Affecting Meat and
Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R (WTO Fed.
13, 1998)},”
4(1) Journal of
International Economic Law
189-208 (March 2001).
McRae,
D., “Claus-Dieter Ehlermann’s presentation on ‘The role and
record of dispute settlement panels and the Appellate Body of the WTO’
[Discussion of
Reflections on the Appellate Body of the WTO],” 6(3) Journal of International
Economic Law 709-17
(September 2003).
Mengozzi, Paolo (ed.), International trade law on the 50th anniversary of the multilateral trade system (Milano: A. Giuffrè, 1999).
Ming,
Qi, “Chinese enterprises to tackle trade dispute by legal means,”
45(18) Beijing
Review 16-18
(
Mitsuo,
M., “A new round of trade negotiation and dispute settlements
at the WTO,” 20(5) Journal of Japanese Trade and Industry 14-17 (September/October
2001).
Morrison, Peter & Gabrielle Marceau, The WTO dispute settlement procedures: a collection of legal texts (Geneva: World Trade Organization, 1995).
Mosoti,
V., “In our own image, not theirs: damages as an antidote to
the remedial deficiences in the WTO dispute settlement process; a view from
Sub-Saharan Africa [Kenya/Uganda/Tanzania],” 19(2)
Nissen, Harck‑Oluf, “Der Helms‑Burton Act vor dem WTO: Zurn Stand des europAisch‑amerikanischenHandelsstreits und der WTO‑Konformitat des Gesetzes,” 45 Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft 350-356 (1999).
Oesch,
M., “Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution,”
6(3) Journal of
International Economic Law 635-59 (September 2003).
Oesterle,
D.A., “The WTO reaches out to the environmentalists: is it too
little, too late?,” 1999 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law &
Policy 1-32
(2000).
Page, Sheila, How Developing Countries Trade: The Institutional Constraints (London: Overseas Development Institute, 1994).
Palmeter, David, “The WTO Appellate Body needs remand authority,”32 Journal of World Trade 41-44 (1998).
—
& Petros C. Mavroidis, Dispute Settlement in
the World Trade Organization (
Paltrowitz,
J.H., “A ‘greening’ of the World Trade Organization? A case
comment on the Asbestos Report {WTO Dispute Settlement Report in re European
Communities--Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products,
WT/DS135/R (WTO Sept. 18, 2000)},” 26(4) Brooklyn Journal of
International Law 1789-838 (2001).
Park,
Y.D., et. al., “WTO dispute settlement 1995-2001: a statistical analysis,”
5(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 221-44 (March 2002).
—
“WTO dispute
settlement 1995-2000: a statistical analysis,” 4(1)
Journal of
International Economic Law 213-30 (March 2001).
—
“WTO dispute settlement 1995-99: a
statistical analysis,” 3(1) Journal of International
Economic Law 193-204
(March 2000).
“Participation of developing countries in the WTO dispute settlement system,” 47(2) Journal of African Law 174-98 (2003).
Pauwelyn,
J., “The use of experts in WTO dispute settlement,”
51(2) The
International & Comparative Law Quarterly 325-64 (April 2002).
Pauwelyn, Joost, “Evidence, proof and persuasion in WTO dispute settlement: Who bears the burden?,” 1 Journal of International Economic Law 227-258 (1998).
Pearlman, Jessica C., “Participation by private counsel in World Trade Organization dispute settlement proceedings,” 30 Law and Policy in International Business 399-415 (1999).
Pescatore,
Pierre, “Text of the oral
presentation by Professor Pierre Pescatore of his report on ‘The new WTO
dispute settlement mechanism’,” in: Demaret,
Paul (ed.), Regionalism and
multilateralism after the
—
“The new WTO ‑ Dispute settlement
mechanism,” in: Demaret, Paul (ed.), Regionalism and multilateralism after
the
—
William J Davey & Andreas F Lowenfeld (eds.),
Handbook of GATT Dispute Settlement (Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY,
Transnational Publ., 1991).
Petersmann,
Ernst-Ulrich, “WTO negotiators meet academics: the negotiations on improvements
of the WTO dispute settlement system,” 6(1) Journal of International
Economic Law
237-50 (March 2003).
—
“From the Hobbesian international law of
coexistence to modern integration law the WTO dispute settlement system,” 1 Journal
of International Economic Law 175-198 (1998).
— The
GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International
Organizations, and Dispute Settlement (London: Kluwer,
1997).
— “The
GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System and the GATT Case Law on Trade‑related
Environmental Measures,” in Kalliopi Koufa
(ed.), International justice XXVI Thesaurus
Acroasium 475(1997).
—
“The Dispute Settlement System of the World
Trade Organisation and the Evolution of the GATT Dispute Settlement System
since 1948,” 31 Common Market Law
Review 1157 (1994).
Plotrowicz,
Ryszard, “The fish that
Potter,
P.B., “China and the WTO: tensions between globalized liberalism
and local culture,” 32(3) Canadian Business Law
Journal 440-62
(December 1999).
Quintillan,
S.P., “Free trade, public health protection and consumer
information in the European WTO context: hormone-treated beef and genetically
modified organisms,” 33(6) Journal of World Trade
147-97 (December 1999).
Qureshi,
A.H., “Extraterritorial shrimps, NGOs and the WTO Appellate Body
{WTO Appellate Body Report in re United States--Import Prohibition of Certain
Shrimp and Shrimp Products (Shrimp-Turtles Case), {1998} 37 I.L.M. 832},”
48(1) The
International & Comparative Law Quarterly 199-206 (January 1999).
Ragosta,
J.A., “Unmasking the WTO--access to the DSB system: can the WTO
DSB live up to the moniker ‘world trade court’?,” 31(3)
Law and Policy in
International Business 739-68
(Spring 2000).
Richards,
E.L., et. al., “The sea turtle dispute {WTO Appellate Body Report in re
United States--Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products
(Shrimp-Turtles Case), {1998} 38 I.L.M. 121}: implications for sovereignty, the
environment, and international trade law,” 71(2) University of Colorado Law
Review 295-341
(Spring 2000).
Robbins,
J., “False friends: amicus curiae and procedural discretion in
WTO appeals under the Hot-rolled Lead /Asbestos doctrine,”
44(1) Harvard
International Law Journal 317-29
(Winter 2003).
Roberts,
L.D., “Beyond Notions of Diplomacy and Legalism: Building A Just
Mechanism for WTO Dispute Resolution,” 40(3) American Business Law Journal
511-62 (Spring 2003).
Roessler,
Frieder, “Comment on a WTO permanent panel body: the Cobra effects
of the WTO panel selection procedures,” 6(1) Journal of International
Economic Law 230-235
(March 2003).
— “Should principles of competition policy be incorporated into WTO law through non-violation complaints?,” 2(3) Journal of International Economic Law 413-21 (September 1999).
— “Evolution
du systeme de reglement des differends du GATT/de IOMC / observations de
Frieder Roessler,” in: La reorganisation mondiale des echanges (
Rosas, A., “Implementation and enforcement of WTO dispute settlement findings: an EU perspective,” 4(1) Journal of International Economic Law 131-44 (March 2001).
Ruttley, Philip, Iain Macvay & Carol George (eds.), The WTO and international trade regulation (London: Cameron May, 1998).
Sabry, F., “The Development and
Effectiveness of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body,” 10(3)
Saiki, Naoko, “WTO rules and procedures for the settlement of disputes ‑ their formation: a practitioner’s view,” in: Young, Michael K. (ed.), Trilateral perspectives on international legal issues (Irvington, NY, 1996), pp. 403‑417.
Salas,
M., et. al., “Procedural overview of the WTO EC-banana dispute,”
3(1) Journal of
International Economic Law
145-66 (March 2000).
Scanlan, William E., “A test case for the new
World Trade Organization’s dispute settlement understanding: the Japan‑United
States auto parts dispute,” 45 University of
Schaefer, Matthew, “National review of WTO
dispute settlement reports : in the name of sovereignty or enhanced WTO rule
compliance?,”
11
Schelin,
Telisa Webb, “
Schleyer, Glen T., “Power to the people: allowing private parties to raise claims before the WTO dispute resolution system,” 65 Fordham Law Review 2275-2311 (1997).
Schloemann,
Hannes L., et. al., “’Constitutionalization’ and dispute settlement in the
WTO: national security as an issue of competence,” 93(2)
American Journal of
International Law 424-51
(April 1999).
Schmid, Christoph, “Immer wieder Bananen: Der des GATT/WTO‑Systems im Gemeinschaftsrecht: Zur Lage nach dern BeschluB des WTO Streitbeilegungsgremiums uber die EG-Bananenmarktordnung vorn 25.9.1997,” 51 Neue juristische Wochenschrift 190-197 (1998).
Schmidt,
C.W., “Caught in the middle: should the World Trade Organization
settle environmental disputes?,” 107(11) Environmental Health
Perspectives (November
1999).
Schoenbaum, Thomas J., “WTO dispute settlement: praise and suggestions for reform,” 47 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 647-658 (1998).
Schwarz, David M., “WTO dispute resolution panels: failing to protect against conflicts of interest,” 10 American University International Law Review 995-991 (1995).
Shaffer,
Gregory, “
Shanker,
D., “The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Dispute
Settlement System of the WTO and the Doha Declaration on the TRIPs Agreement,”
36(4) Journal of
World Trade 721-72
(August 2002).
Shaw,
S., et. al., “Trade and environment in the WTO: state of play,”
36(1) Journal of
World Trade 129-54
(February 2002).
Shirzad,
F., “The WTO dispute settlement system: prospects for reform,”
31(3) Law and
Policy in International Business 769-72 (Spring 2000).
Shoyer,
Andrew W., “Panel selection in WTO dispute settlement proceedings,”
6(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 203-9 (March 2003).
—
“The first three years of WTO dispute settlement:
observations and suggestions,” 1 Journal of International Economic Law
277-302 (1998).
Simmons,
Benjamin, “In search of
balance: an analysis of the WTO Shrimp/Turtle Appellate Body Report,” 24
Snoderly, Anna Beth, “Cleaning the air:
environmental regulation, dispute resolution, and domestic sovereignty under
the World Trade
Organization / Anna Beth Snoderly,” in: 22
Srinvasan, T.N.., Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System (Westview: Boulder, 1998).
Steger,
Debra P., “WTO dispute settlement,” in: Ruttley, Philip (ed.), The
WTO and international trade regulation (
—
“World Trade Organization dispute settlement:
the first three years,” 1 Journal of International Economic Law 199-226
(1998).
Stoll, Peter‑Tobias, “WTO dispute settlement: the impernentation stage,” 3 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 407-437 (1999).
Straight, Samuel C., “GATT and NAFTA: marrying effective dispute settlement and the sovereignty of the fifty states,” 45 Duke Law Journal 216-265 (1995).
Sullivan,
H.D., “Regional Jet Trade Wars: Politics and Compliance in WTO
Dispute Resolution,” 12(1)
Swacker, F.W., World Trade without Barriers: the WTO and Dispute Resolution (Charlottesville, Va., Butterworth, 1995-).
—
et.
al., “WTO & ADR [book excerpt from World
trade without barriers],” 55(3) Dispute Resolution Journal 35-8, 81-7 (August/October 2000)
“Symposium issue on WTO dispute settlement compliance,” 33(4) Law and Policy in International Business 555-825 (Summer 2002).
Tanaka,
M., “Bridging the Gap Between Northern NGOs and Southern
Sovereigns in the Trade-Environment Debate: The Pursuit of Democratic Dispute
Settlements in the WTO Under the Rio Principles,” 30(1)
Ecology Law
Quarterly 113-88
(2003).
Taylor,
C.R., et. al., “The U.S. /EU Beef Controversy and a Proposed Framework for
Resolving Standards Disputes in International Trade,”
37(1) The Journal
of Consumer Affairs 101-22
(Summer 2003).
Thomas, Jeffrey C., “The need for due process in WTO proceedings,” 31 Journal of World Trade, 45-57 1997).
—
& Michael A. Meyer, The New Rules of
Global Trade: A Guide to the World Trade Organization (Scarborough, Canada:
Thomson Professional Publishing, 1997).
Timura,
C.T., “Cross-Examination Expertise in the WTO Dispute Settlement
Process,” 23(3)
Trachtman,
J.P., et. al., “Costs and Benefits of Private Participation in WTO Dispute
Settlement: Whose Right Is It Anyway?,” 44(1) Harvard International Law
Journal 221-50
(Winter 2003).
—
“The domain of
WTO dispute resolution,” 40(2) Harvard International Law
Journal 333-77 (Spring
1999).
Triggs,
G., “Asian nations in transition to market economies and the
World Trade Organisation: the Shrimp case {WTO Appellate Body Report in re
United States--Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products
(Shrimp-Turtles Case), {1998} 38 I.L.M. 121},” 28(2)
International
Journal of Legal Information 336-49 (Summer 2000).
Umbricht,
G.C., “An ‘amicus curiae brief’ on amicus curiae briefs at the
WTO,” 4(4) Journal of International Economic Law 773-94 (December 2001).
Van
der Borght, K., “The review of the WTO understanding on dispute settlement:
some reflections on the current debate,” 14(4) American University
International Law Review 1223-43
(1999).
VanCalster, Geert, “The WTO Appellate Body in Shrimp/ Turtle: picking up the pieces,” 8 European Environmental Law Review 111-115 (1999).
Vazquez,
C.M., et. al., “Some reflections on compliance with WTO dispute settlement
decisions,” 33(4) Law and Policy in International Business 555-67 (Summer 2002).
Verhoosel, G., National treatment and WTO dispute settlement: adjudicating the boundaries of regulatory autonomy (Hart, 2002).
Vermulst, Edwin & Folkert Graafsma, WTO
disputes: anti-dumping, subsidies and safeguards (
—
“WTO dispute
settlement with respect to trade contingency measures,”
35(2) Journal of
World Trade 209-28
(April 2001).
—
“The functioning of the Appellate Body after
four years: Towards rule integrity,” 33 Journal of World Trade 1-50
(1999).
Villalpando,
S.M., “Attribution of Conduct to the State: How the Rules of
State Responsibility May Be Applied Within the WTO Dispute Settlement System,”
5(2) Journal of
International Economic Law 393-420 (June 2002).
Waincymer, Jeff, “Reformulated gasoline under
reformulated WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures Pulling Pandora out of a
chapeau?,”
18
Warren Swacker, Frank, Kenneth Robert Redden, Larry B Wenger, & Marion Fountain McCurdy (eds.), World Trade Without Barriers: The World Trade Organisation and Dispute Resolution (Charlottesville, Va. : Michie Butterworth, 1995-)
Wasescha,
L., “Comment on a WTO permanent panel body,”
6(1) Journal of
International Economic Law 224-7 (March 2003).
Weiler,
J.H.H., The rule of lawyers and the ethos of diplomats:
reflections on the internal and external legitimacy of WTO dispute settlement,
35(2) Journal of
World Trade 191-207
(April 2001).
Weiss, Friedl, “WTO dispute settlement and the economic order of WTO member states,” in: Dijck, Pitou van (ed.), Challenges to the new World Trade Organization (Hague, 1996), pp. 77‑91.
Wethington,
O.L., “Commentary on the consultation mechanism under the WTO
dispute settlement understanding during its first five years,”
31(3) Law and
Policy in International Business 583-90 (Spring 2000).
Wilson,
S.B., “Can the WTO dispute settlement body be a judicial tribunal
rather than a diplomatic club?,” 31(3) Law and Policy in
International Business 779-81
(Spring 2000).
Wirth,
D.A., “GATT--technical barriers to trade agreement--asbestos
import ban--national treatment--like products--health measures--private-party
submissions to WTO dispute settlement bodies,” 96(2)
American Journal of
International Law 435-9
(April 2002).
Wofford,
C., “A greener future at the WTO: the refinement of WTO
jurisprudence on environmental exceptions to GATT,”
24(2) Harvard
Environmental Law Review 563-92
(2000).
World Trade Organization, The WTO dispute
settlement procedures: a collection of the relevant legal texts (
Yamane, Hiroko, “The WTO dispute settlement mechanism and Japanese traders,” 1 Journal of International Economic Law 683-689 (1998).
Yu,
L., “Rule of law or rule of protectionism: anti-dumping
practices toward China and the WTO dispute settlement system,”
15(2)
Zdouc,
Werner, “WTO dispute settlement practice relating to the GATS,”
2(2) Journal of
International Economic Law 295-346 (June 1999).
Zekos,
G.I., “Arbitration as a Dispute Settlement Mechanism Under
UNCLOS, the Hamburg Rules, and WTO,” 19(5) Journal of International
Arbitration 497-504
(October 2002).
—
“An
examination of GATT/WTO arbitration procedures,”
54(4) Dispute
Resolution Journal 72-6
(November 1999).
Zhu,
L., “The effects of the WTO Dispute Settlement Panel and
Appellate Body reports: is the Dispute Settlement Body resolving specifc
disputes
only or making precedent at the same time?,”
17(1) Temple
International and Comparative Law Journal 221-36 (Spring 2003).
Ziegler, Andreas R., “Scope and function of the WTO Appellate System: what future after the Millennium Round?,” 3 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 439-470 (1999).
—
“Erste Erfahrungen mit der Berufungsinstanz der
WTO: Anmerkungen zurn WTOStreitschlichtungsverfahren ‘
Zonnekeyn,
G.A., “The latest on indirect effect of WTO law in the EC legal
order. The Nakajima {Nakajima All Precision Co. Ltd. v. Council, {1991}
E.C.R.
I-2069} case law misjudged?,” 4(3) Journal of International
Economic Law 597-08
(September 2001).
—
“The Appellate
Body’s communication on amicus curiae briefs in the asbestos case,”
35(3) Journal of
World Trade 553
(June 2001).
Data obtained from the Project on International Courts and Tribunals (PICT)
WorldLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/PICTRes/2004/7.html